Duty-station comparison Air Force only

Air Force Installation Cost Gap

Unlike the raw BAH comparison, this tool applies a cost-of-living factor to the delta so you see the real purchasing power gap between two Air Force installations.

Current military paygrade.

Completed years in service used for the base-pay row.

Select whether this scenario is with dependents or without dependents.

Primary duty-station ZIP used for BAH.

Second ZIP used for side-by-side affordability comparisons.

Advanced assumptions (optional)
Special pay (monthly)

Optional monthly special/incentive pay to add to compensation.

Estimated deduction rate

Estimated share of gross pay withheld for taxes and deductions.

Current ZIP cost factor

Cost factor for the current ZIP result (1.00 means no adjustment).

Comparison ZIP cost factor

Cost factor for the comparison ZIP result (1.00 means no adjustment).

Complete required fields, then select Calculate.

Estimate confidence: PENDING INPUT

Data as of 2026-01-01

Included in estimate

  • Base pay (paygrade + years of service)
  • BAS
  • BAH (ZIP + dependent status)
  • Special pay entered in this scenario
  • Cost-of-living factor used by this tool
  • Deduction rate assumption shown in this tool

Not included

  • Service-specific incentive pays not entered (for example sea pay or flight pay)
  • Future pay-table or allowance updates after the data date
  • Personal tax credits/deductions beyond the selected deduction assumption

What this tool is for

Use when a raw BAH comparison between two Air Force ZIPs understates the real economic difference. The cost factor accounts for installation-specific cost differences that BAH alone does not capture.

Worked example

Example: comparing Langley AFB vs Peterson SFB at E-7 with dependents shows not just the BAH difference but the adjusted purchasing power gap after the cost factor.

When to use it

Use it when assignment planning hinges on real economic difference, not just the housing allowance number.

When not to use it

Do not use it as a cost-of-living guarantee. The site cost factor is an editorial assumption, not a DoD-published rate.

What the result means

The cost-adjusted gap is a planning proxy. The cost factor is disclosed as a site assumption. Verify local costs independently.

Official sources used

Direct links to the official pages this tool relies on.

Site assumptions

  • The cost-of-living adjustment factor is a site editorial estimate. It is not a DoD-published rate.
  • BAH is the DoD-published rate for each ZIP at the entered paygrade and dependent status.

What is included

  • BAH for both ZIPs at the entered paygrade and dependent status
  • Base pay and BAS at the entered paygrade and years of service
  • Cost-of-living factor applied to the delta

What is not included

  • COLA (OCONUS)
  • Actual local housing market prices
  • State income tax differences between installations

Verify with

  • DTMO BAH lookup for each ZIP
  • The gaining installation housing office
  • Local housing market research

Frequently asked questions

Is this an official government site?

No. This is an independent planning utility, not an official U.S. Government website. Do not submit CUI, ITAR, classified, or sensitive personal information. Always verify estimates with official sources before making financial decisions.

How accurate are these estimates?

These are planning estimates based on official DFAS, DoD, and service-specific sources. Actual pay may vary based on your specific situation, special pays, tax withholdings, and other factors. Use these tools for planning purposes and verify with your finance office.

When was this data last updated?

Check the source and assumptions sections on this page for the current effective date used by the site. If the linked official pages have changed since then, use the official pages first.

How do cost factors affect the comparison?

Cost factors adjust the estimated purchasing power of your compensation at each location. A cost factor above 1.0 means higher living costs, while below 1.0 means lower costs compared to the baseline.

This estimate uses simplified planning assumptions. Review the linked methodology and official source pages before making financial decisions. Spotted an error or have a suggestion? Send a note.